data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4745/c4745e17a85b7a98c227fde8df3564f13c7c0228" alt=""
I learnt a valuable lesson when handling cameras, and I learnt it the hard way. I wanted to do a self-portrait for the purposes of updating my resume and professional profiles, so I used a tripod to prop my Olympus PEN up. Unfortunately, I must have extended one of the legs shorter than the others, and as such, when I released my grip on the tripod, the inevitable consequence of gravity taking over happened:
The camera fell facewards towards the ground. Before I could react, it had already landed squarely onto the lens with an audible crack. It was disheartening when I inspected the damage: the lens was bent (M.Zuiko lenses have an inner/outer shaft assembly to zoom), the motor was stuck, and the focusing ring was jammed. In short, I transformed a 14-42mm zoom lens into a 25mm out-of-focus prime lens.
At least the lens bore the full brunt of the damage. The body miraculously had no scratches or dents, and it could still take pictures, although I couldn't tell if the camera functions were working properly since the lens was out-of-focus.
With much thanksgiving, someone with a spare lens responded to my shout-out on Facebook (social media does have a use after all), and it was a fantastic 14-42mm Mark II! With a slimmer profile, a faster focusing motor, and a refined lens construction which made images sharper, I found a new-found obsession to using my PEN. Here's a sample of shots taken:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97934/97934695141e388a68a4d3dbe199730559a98422" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87ae4/87ae4104d9770161ebab26517d395b320dae91b3" alt=""
I admit, I'm primarily a P shooter, which I think is automatic on steroids. These were taken outdoors under shade with ISO 400. With plenty of light, this ISO could freeze our laughter (captured brilliantly by Julia!).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9f3a/d9f3aed52563812ce8fbf3f9ea78e0c0d220e2f7" alt=""
Indoor shots with ISO 800 had a little more grain to them, but I had to crank it up to counter the darkness of the stage (our church meets in the cinema, and the only source of illumination are a pair of stage lights that are point, strong sources of light). Even at this ISO, I could not eliminate motion blur:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2553/a2553336110e9ba0bc0dd21325eb4d3ce64249c4" alt=""
It seems that this Mk II lens does not perform as well as its previous incarnation in low-light situations, but I suppose there must be a trade-off somewhere. I'm going to buy this lens off you, Uncle Michael! Thanks heaps for helping me return my PEN to service.
For further reading:
Olympus M.Zuiko 14-42mm Mk I vs 14-42mm Mk II
0 comments:
Post a Comment